Educating for Sustainable Worlds PG (9088.3)
Available teaching periods | Delivery mode | Location |
---|---|---|
View teaching periods | Intensive |
Bruce, Canberra |
EFTSL | Credit points | Faculty |
0.125 | 3 | Faculty Of Education |
Discipline | Study level | HECS Bands |
Academic Program Area - Education | Post Graduate Level | Band 1 2021 (Commenced After 1 Jan 2021) Band 1 2021 (Commenced Before 1 Jan 2021) |
These different perspectives will also be used to critique relevant international and domestic strategic directions, policies and programs. Students will be encouraged to revision the possibilities of educating for sustainable worlds in ways that are inclusive of both human and ecological communities.
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, students will be able to:1. Demonstrate understanding of sustainability as a complex and interconnected challenge requiring multiple perspectives and problem-solving strategies;
2. Inquire into different perspectives on sustainability and analyse their ethical and practical implications for professional practice;
3. Effectively communicate their knowledge about global and domestic sustainability policies and programs and their opinions about them; and
4. Demonstrate their capacity to combine professional knowledge and social responsibility through revisioning ways of educating for sustainable human and ecological communities.
Graduate attributes
1. º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ graduates are professional - use creativity, critical thinking, analysis and research skills to solve theoretical and real-world problems1. º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ graduates are professional - communicate effectively
2. º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ graduates are global citizens - think globally about issues in their profession
3. º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ graduates are lifelong learners - adapt to complexity, ambiguity and change by being flexible and keen to engage with new ideas
Prerequisites
None.Corequisites
None.Incompatible units
Restrictions: This unit is not open to students who have passed 7678 Sustainable Futures PG.Equivalent units
None.Assumed knowledge
None.Year | Location | Teaching period | Teaching start date | Delivery mode | Unit convener |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | Bruce, Canberra | Semester 1 | 05 February 2024 | Intensive | Dr Ann Hill |
2024 | Bruce, Canberra | Winter Term | 27 May 2024 | Intensive | Dr Ann Hill |
2025 | Bruce, Canberra | Semester 1 | 03 February 2025 | Intensive | Dr Ann Hill |
2025 | Bruce, Canberra | Winter Term | 26 May 2025 | Intensive | Dr Ann Hill |
Required texts
The reading list will be provided in Canvas. There are essential readings for each module of work and these are labelled essential in the Canvas reading list.
Submission of assessment items
Extensions & Late submissions
Approval of extenuating circumstances will be dependent upon the production of supporting documentation and at the discretion of the unit convener.
All assessment items required to be submitted online must be submitted via the appropriate Canvas drop box. It is the student's responsibility to upload the correct and corresponding draft or assessment item to the right submission section. Assignments must be submitted in a format accessible to the assessor(s), as stated on the relevant canvas site.
If the unit convener and/or tutor are unable to access a submission, or if no submission has been made by the due date and time, a standard late penalty of 10% of the total marks possible for the task may be applied per day, for three days, after which the submission will receive a score of ‘0' in keeping with º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ's Assessment Policy.
GenAI may only be used in authorised ways when completing assessments at º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ. This means that GenAI can only be used for an assessment when:
Students should be aware that the º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ utilises GenAI detection software. Suspected instances of unauthorised GenAI use may lead to a Learning Validation Conversation' designed to provide assurance that a student is able to demonstrate relevant knowledge and skills to meet required learning outcomes. Students who are suspected of having misused GenAI in assessment may be required to attend a summary inquiry for suspected misconduct.
It is strongly recommended that students keep records of the development process for all works submitted for assessment, or drafts of work submitted for a work-in-progress review, in a learning portfolio or equivalent. Failure to provide evidence of the development process for assessment may influence a suspicion of GenAI misuse or other forms of academic misconduct.
The GenAI for Students Library Guide provides further information, including how to reference GenAI.
Provision of valid documentation
Please note that the University takes student conduct very seriously. All documentation provided to University staff must be valid and the provision of fraudulent documentation carries with it potentially serious consequences, including suspension and/or exclusion from the University. Note that all allegations of student misconduct will be referred to the Associate Dean for Education (ADE) as a prescribed authority for investigation.
Note that the University supported text matching software is Turnitin, which is available to all units via Canvas. For further information, please see this guide in The Shed - https://uclearn.canberra.edu.au/courses/96/pages/turnitin-2/
Students must apply academic integrity in their learning and research activities at º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ. This includes submitting authentic and original work for assessments and properly acknowledging any sources used.
Academic integrity involves the ethical, honest and responsible use, creation and sharing of information. It is critical to the quality of higher education. Our academic integrity values are honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility and courage.
º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ students have to complete the annually to learn about academic integrity and to understand the consequences of academic integrity breaches (or academic misconduct).
º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ uses various strategies and systems, including detection software, to identify potential breaches of academic integrity. Suspected breaches may be investigated, and action can be taken when misconduct is found to have occurred.
Information is provided in the Academic Integrity Policy, Academic Integrity Procedure, and º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ (Student Conduct) Rules 2023. For further advice, visit Study Skills.
Learner engagement
This unit requires ongoing commitment to student learning and professional engagement. Indicative hours are as follows:
Workshops: 20 hours
Private study/research: 30 hours
Workplace learning: 50 hours
Assessment tasks: 50 hours
Inclusion and engagement
-
Participation requirements
Engagement with mini-lectures and online activities is required pre, during and post the Intensive in order to prepare for the assessment tasks and to demonstrate that you have achieved the learning outcomes.
Required IT skills
Ability to operate proficiently and independently in the Online Canvas environment
In-unit costs
None
Work placement, internships or practicums
None
Additional information
The theoretical foundations of this unit are interdisciplinary. They draw from earth systems science, environmental philosophy and non-western philosophies. The unit is also research led. The unit convener (and guest speakers where applicable) are active researchers. Unit content is based upon their research.
- Semester 1, 2025, Intensive, º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ - Canberra, Bruce (224689)
- Winter Term, 2024, Intensive, º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ - Canberra, Bruce (222150)
- Semester 1, 2024, Intensive, º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ - Canberra, Bruce (218887)
- Semester 1, 2023, Intensive, º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ - Canberra, Bruce (212976)
- Semester 1, 2022, Intensive, º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ - Canberra, Bruce (205940)
- Semester 1, 2021, Intensive, º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ - Canberra, Bruce (200906)
- Semester 1, 2020, Intensive, º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ - Canberra, Bruce (198585)
- Semester 1, 2018, On-campus, º¬Ðß²ÝÊÓƵ - Canberra, Bruce (182600)